Search found 5 matches
- Thu Jun 17, 2021 12:37 pm
- Forum: General questions and comments
- Topic: FRP running on apple silicon/M1 mac ?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 9228
Re: FRP running on apple silicon/M1 mac ?
Probably a little late for this reply, but I've been running it with no issues on MacBook Air with M1.
- Wed Feb 13, 2019 4:23 pm
- Forum: General questions and comments
- Topic: IRS Rule 72(t) and Rule of 55
- Replies: 7
- Views: 18191
Re: IRS Rule 72(t) and Rule of 55
Thanks Jim! I think it worked out the way I intended after some adjustments as you mentioned. The ending value of the tax deferred portion was close enough to what's predicted by the SEPP calculator: https://72t.net/72t/calculator/distributions For the remainder of my current tax deferred savings, I...
- Mon Feb 11, 2019 3:52 pm
- Forum: General questions and comments
- Topic: IRS Rule 72(t) and Rule of 55
- Replies: 7
- Views: 18191
Re: IRS Rule 72(t) and Rule of 55
I'm trying to wrap my head around this stuff too. The way I understand it is the Rule of 55 is independent of the Rule 72(t) or SEPP so I'm basically ignoring Rule of 55 (I'm currently 50). https://millennialmoney.com/how-to-hack-your-401k-withdrawal-penalty/ Anyway, presuming the value is calculate...
- Thu Nov 08, 2018 6:54 pm
- Forum: General questions and comments
- Topic: Bug or did I change something by mistake?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5297
Re: Bug or did I change something by mistake?
Thanks Jim, I will send you a file asap. It's now happened with 2 different files consistently and I can't seem to reverse it, very bizarre since it looks like it's a text file input.
- Thu Nov 08, 2018 2:49 pm
- Forum: General questions and comments
- Topic: Bug or did I change something by mistake?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5297
Bug or did I change something by mistake?
This has now happened to me twice. After having a file more or less setup the way I want, I continue to tweak the value for "Annual Retirement Spending" but after working fine for numerous values, suddenly it has no more effect on the probability of success. It seems like it gets stuck at ...